Of, Senator Mitch McConnell! Page 355, Chapter 12 tells the story:
In September of 2006, Senator Mitch McConnell went to President George W. Bush for a private meeting. McConnell told Bush “that the Republican Party was in trouble and they could lose control of both Houses of Congress.” McConnell told Bush “that he should bring some troops home from
In an amazing moment of courage, President George W. Bush told the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell – “that he was not going to reduce the troops but reinforce the troop strength, because he did not send the troops into Iraq to win an Election, he sent them their to win a war.”
Like many, to this day I believe it was a total blunder on Mr. Bush’s part to go to war with Iraq, for nothing good has come out of that very misguided policy, but as much as I am a critic of Mr. Bush on so many levels, at least in this case, President Bush made a most courageous decision, and I applaud him for that.
See the Editorial as written in The Courier Journal,
“George W. Bush got a lot wrong in his administration, but he certainly did figure out Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell.
In his new memoir, Decision Points, the former president tells of a meeting he held in September 2006 with Mr. McConnell, then the Republican whip in the Senate. The occupation of
But why was he concerned? It wasn't because of bloodshed, destruction, a hemorrhaging budget or a slide toward disaster. He was fearful that the morass in
This incident, which Sen. McConnell's office has not denied, shines brightly on the contemptible hypocrisy and obsessive partisanship that have come to mark the senator's time in office.
At the time that Sen. McConnell was privately advising Mr. Bush to reduce troop levels in
Unless he is prepared to call a former president of his own party a liar, Mr. McConnell has a choice. He can admit that he did not actually believe the
Mr. Bush did not take Sen. McConnell's advice. Indeed, after the election he increased American troop strength in the so-called “surge.” The former president presumably recounts the 2006 meeting to show that he placed a higher priority on success in
As usual, Sen. McConnell's political instincts were right. The Republicans did lose control of both houses of Congress to the Democrats in the November 2006 election. In
But the public has a right to expect its leaders to pursue loftier goals than partisan success. When voters hear Sen. McConnell these days — at a time of continuing economic hardship — say that Republicans' top priority must be to limit President Obama to a single term, they should ask themselves: Why does he place greater value on that purely political goal than on American citizens' well-being?”
(The Courier Journal link)
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2010311110017
Sheriff G Ali
No comments:
Post a Comment